Skip to main content

Advocating for science

© Calvin and Hobbes by Bill Watterson

A country's expenditure on research and the attitudes of its citizens towards science and technology are one of the leading parameters of development of a country. India spends about 0.65 % of its GDP (world bank data for 2015) on research and development, a number that has not changed much in two decades. The Indian educational system too on the other hand does not help in creating scientific temperament. The education is mostly a means to secure a job, any job, however far removed it might be from the field you've studied. 

These issues are even more apparent when you interact with people not related to the field. There is a lack of curiosity about science even among educated people. In fact, some are also of the view that it is a waste of the taxpayer's money. They go so far as to complain about the fact that their tax money is being used to fund PhD scholarships of students in Indian institutions. This, when the government's own defense and space research related programs make up for nearly 55% of the total R&D expenditure, while only 5.9% is used towards research at institutions which include the salaries and scholarships for Professors and students. It is to be noted though that these students are qualified folks who are accepted into institutions after having competed in nationwide exams for their field. The Professors too have got their position after having completed their PhD and several years of hard postdoctoral research on salaries that are barely above minimum wage. They are truly the best who are in it solely for their love of science. And still, it pains some to see them paid even a small stipend.

This attitude is clearly a result of our education system which emphasizes on rote learning and not on developing and nurturing a curious mind. Because, how can they appreciate research when they have never stopped to think about the theories in their textbooks. How can they ever hope to understand why basic science is important when they have never appreciated the way nature works, like a well oiled machine. Not everyone has to do do research, but everyone should get excited about new developments in the fields of science and technology. Our world today is so technology driven that one can't even imagine a life without it. But, who cares right, when it's much easier to just remain stupid and unaware. Here's hoping that attitudes change.



Popular posts from this blog

Can you ever question your belief in God?

Your religion is decided for you based on the family you're born into almost immediately after your birth. This is further reinforced during your childhood with the various customs and rituals that you're part of, each one involving prayers to a higher being. Then, it is no surprise that you get brainwashed into believing in God. After all, it is the biggest fantasy or myth that your parents and your community have indulged in and have made you a part of, so much so, that it becomes part of your identity. Later when you experience more of the world, learn more science, see more sense in logic than unfounded beliefs, you start to question the existence of God. You notice how the fallacy of the religious belief begs the question that if God created man, who created God? You probably have already imbibed so much of the belief both consciously and sub-consciously that any loss in this faith comes across to you as a desertion of your own identity. How then can you ever break away …

Nature gives us no choice...

The breaking news story in the world of sports right now is the one about Serena Williams announcing her pregnancy. And while this is probably good news, it is not something her fans look forward to. I'm sure it must have been a huge decision for her and something that she must be coming to terms with even now as I write this. The pregnancy means that Serena Williams, the best women's tennis player ever in the open era, who is still at her prime and has just won the Australian Open 2017 will now miss the rest of the season this year. How unfair is that! Why does she have to choose between being a mother and playing tennis when her male counterparts just go through parenthood with a breeze. They never ever have to sit out, never have to make such life changing decisions, never have to contemplate and plan their return to tennis after the birth of their child. 
It is just frustrating that the likes of Djokovic and Federer have been at their prime winning titles with fatherhood …