Skip to main content

The experimental conundrum

It's been more than eight months since I took the decision to try my hands at experiments. It was a crazy decision to say the least. I have gone from "Hah! What was I thinking!!" to "God! This is so taxing!" to "Yeah! I own this shit. No big deal." It's been frustrating and overwhelming and yet so worth the time and effort I put in. 

When I started out last year, it was the first time in 7 years that I even held a beaker or a conical flask in my hand, let alone a living organism like a worm. I was unsure if I would be any good and it seemed overwhelming. But, I took the plunge anyway. In the beginning I was excited about this fresh challenge. Call it my ignorance, but what I didn't realize at the time was that I would have to be attuned to the worm's and its food, the bacteria's, life cycle. This meant that some steps of the experimental protocol would fall late at night or early in the morning. And so, I became the legendary sleep deprived biologist who was awake feeding the lab animal at odd hours. 

It's been a learning experience though. I failed at experiments multiple times due to various reasons some of which were quite silly. Either because of bad planning, I couldn't keep time, or my stuff got contaminated or a third worse scenario when I forgot an important step or ingredient. But, unlike theoretical modeling, I couldn't start over immediately. I needed to do the preliminary steps or prepare media all over again which took up to 2-3 days. This just made me realize how important planning and creating backups was. 

Doing experiments myself has also given me an appreciation for the effort that one puts in to generate real-time data. The experimentalist literally owns her data, knowing every single detail like no one else. And this is valuable knowledge, sometimes leading to fresh research problems. I have also accepted the fact that the first time I learn something new, I am going to fail. There are skills in the experimental world that require practice and there is absolutely no way around it. But, there is also no greater joy when you perfect that skill and get it right. 

Here's to more such crazy challenges and greater pay-offs, hopefully. *fingers crossed*



  1. Good!
    I particularly like the last point, when you do the experiment the data are yours, and that no one else knows the data the way you do, you know every detail of it.

    In my case, I work with the study of others' speech, which means I need to see not just what they say, but also how they say that, their words, accent, intonation. For a professor in our univerfsity system, where I have been for somne years, it is possible to ask one of your students to transcribe the speech. Transcribing other's speech is so monotonous, and so fatally boring! You will still see the gross details when your students do this. But, you have rightly said, when I do it myself, overcoming my reluctance at such a mundane chore, I see things which I never would otherwise. I would never know that an American scientist of Indian origin, in spite of decades in the U S, stresses the penultimate vowel in Biology and adds a vowel before students, or inserts a vowel in film, making it a bi-syllabic word. Hands do not just feed mouths, they also feed brains!

    Good luck! Keep your fingers busy too!

    1. Thanks a lot for your insightful comment. Especially like how you've so beautifully summarized my whole thought in "Hands do not just feed mouths, they also feed brains!" :)

    2. This comment has been removed by the author.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advocating for science

A country's expenditure on research and the attitudes of its citizens towards science and technology are one of the leading parameters of development of a country. India spends about 0.65 % of its GDP (world bank data for 2015) on research and development, a number that has not changed much in two decades. The Indian educational system too on the other hand does not help in creating scientific temperament. The education is mostly a means to secure a job, any job, however far removed it might be from the field you've studied. 
These issues are even more apparent when you interact with people not related to the field. There is a lack of curiosity about science even among educated people. In fact, some are also of the view that it is a waste of the taxpayer's money. They go so far as to complain about the fact that their tax money is being used to fund PhD scholarships of students in Indian institutions. This, when the government's own defense and space research related …

Can you ever question your belief in God?

Your religion is decided for you based on the family you're born into almost immediately after your birth. This is further reinforced during your childhood with the various customs and rituals that you're part of, each one involving prayers to a higher being. Then, it is no surprise that you get brainwashed into believing in God. After all, it is the biggest fantasy or myth that your parents and your community have indulged in and have made you a part of, so much so, that it becomes part of your identity. Later when you experience more of the world, learn more science, see more sense in logic than unfounded beliefs, you start to question the existence of God. You notice how the fallacy of the religious belief begs the question that if God created man, who created God? You probably have already imbibed so much of the belief both consciously and sub-consciously that any loss in this faith comes across to you as a desertion of your own identity. How then can you ever break away …

Nature gives us no choice...

The breaking news story in the world of sports right now is the one about Serena Williams announcing her pregnancy. And while this is probably good news, it is not something her fans look forward to. I'm sure it must have been a huge decision for her and something that she must be coming to terms with even now as I write this. The pregnancy means that Serena Williams, the best women's tennis player ever in the open era, who is still at her prime and has just won the Australian Open 2017 will now miss the rest of the season this year. How unfair is that! Why does she have to choose between being a mother and playing tennis when her male counterparts just go through parenthood with a breeze. They never ever have to sit out, never have to make such life changing decisions, never have to contemplate and plan their return to tennis after the birth of their child. 
It is just frustrating that the likes of Djokovic and Federer have been at their prime winning titles with fatherhood …