Skip to main content

The sea or the mountains?

I visited two cities recently. One is at the sea, while the other is in the mountains. One, bustling with life and energy, the other, quiet, serene and peaceful. Both were covered in snow when I got there. One has a really huge International Airport, the other has an airport smaller than a train station about one hour away from the city with just two airlines running. One is Boston/Cambridge in Massachusetts, the other Los Alamos in New Mexico.

Because I went to the two places within two weeks of each other, I couldn't help but notice the difference. Los Alamos is a desert with vast empty spaces, few people and fewer restaurants. But, it is also a beautiful place. You step out of the Los Alamos National Lab and you see the snow capped mountains and realize that you can't take your eyes off them. When writers wax lyrical about nature hypnotizing you, this is what they mean. The scenery is so beautiful with the morning sun rays falling over the snow capped peaks turning them a faint glow of white and yellow. And, they're right outside the lab. I can't imagine a more beautiful setting to do research. 

The other place I visited was right in the heart of Cambridge with busy narrow streets, well connected with the Metro and the bus service, which they call the T-line. Even in that cold winter of -10 deg Celsius and a few inches of snow, there were people on the streets walking about, some salesmen selling you stuff or asking for donations (in one case to help curtail climate change). It wasn't beautiful in the usual sense, but it was rather quaint with graffiti and other revolutionary or modern writings or drawings on the walls. It had many small bookshops, which I really liked, something that in most places has given way to huge chain stores in recent times. I wondered how they survived as I browsed through them. Even at night, it was bustling with life, the cafes were filled with people. It gave me a sense of belonging even though I didn't know anybody. I didn't have time to go to the sea, but I walked around until I was too cold. Then, stopped to have a quiche and a cup of coffee at a cafe and then walked around some more before I had to catch the T. 

It was during dinner at Los Alamos though that the question of the ideal place to live in came up. Was it the sea or the mountains? Everyone had their preference. But, as I tried to answer this question, it made me realize something about myself that I hadn't known earlier. I was in a very beautiful place at the time; I knew I had never seen something like this before. But, I also wondered if I would be happy living and working in such a quiet place. It might be nice for a vacation, but wouldn't I get tired of it if I had to look at it everyday? I didn't know the answer to that. But, what I did know was that city life appealed more to me and a quiet place scared me a bit. It is strange really as I am not a people's person. I like to be in my own little space with a book or my laptop. I don't mind walking around alone. But, I do know something now. I know that I prefer being alone in a crowded place than lonely in a quiet place. 

So anyway, what is it for you? The sea or the mountains, the city or a quiet retreat?



  1. Both .. and also a forest :)

    1. Hehe.. it would be incredible if all were in one place. :)


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advocating for science

A country's expenditure on research and the attitudes of its citizens towards science and technology are one of the leading parameters of development of a country. India spends about 0.65 % of its GDP (world bank data for 2015) on research and development, a number that has not changed much in two decades. The Indian educational system too on the other hand does not help in creating scientific temperament. The education is mostly a means to secure a job, any job, however far removed it might be from the field you've studied. 
These issues are even more apparent when you interact with people not related to the field. There is a lack of curiosity about science even among educated people. In fact, some are also of the view that it is a waste of the taxpayer's money. They go so far as to complain about the fact that their tax money is being used to fund PhD scholarships of students in Indian institutions. This, when the government's own defense and space research related …

Can you ever question your belief in God?

Your religion is decided for you based on the family you're born into almost immediately after your birth. This is further reinforced during your childhood with the various customs and rituals that you're part of, each one involving prayers to a higher being. Then, it is no surprise that you get brainwashed into believing in God. After all, it is the biggest fantasy or myth that your parents and your community have indulged in and have made you a part of, so much so, that it becomes part of your identity. Later when you experience more of the world, learn more science, see more sense in logic than unfounded beliefs, you start to question the existence of God. You notice how the fallacy of the religious belief begs the question that if God created man, who created God? You probably have already imbibed so much of the belief both consciously and sub-consciously that any loss in this faith comes across to you as a desertion of your own identity. How then can you ever break away …

Nature gives us no choice...

The breaking news story in the world of sports right now is the one about Serena Williams announcing her pregnancy. And while this is probably good news, it is not something her fans look forward to. I'm sure it must have been a huge decision for her and something that she must be coming to terms with even now as I write this. The pregnancy means that Serena Williams, the best women's tennis player ever in the open era, who is still at her prime and has just won the Australian Open 2017 will now miss the rest of the season this year. How unfair is that! Why does she have to choose between being a mother and playing tennis when her male counterparts just go through parenthood with a breeze. They never ever have to sit out, never have to make such life changing decisions, never have to contemplate and plan their return to tennis after the birth of their child. 
It is just frustrating that the likes of Djokovic and Federer have been at their prime winning titles with fatherhood …