Skip to main content

The US Diaries

Dated: 27th Jan 2013

I have now come to an end of my two week trip, a trip that was so packed that I missed the entire Australian Open (anyone who knows me will realize that's quite a big deal!).

As soon as you land, you immediately know that you have landed in USA, as there is Obama's face peering at you from every TV screen and every poster at the airport. There is also the debate about gun laws going on in every news channel. And, when you step out of the airport, the traffic is going the opposite way, and when you go to any burger place for a bite, you watch NBA basketball when just the day before you were watching cricket while eating your burger at the same Mc Donald's burger joint. I am not saying anything new here. Everybody knows these things, but, these are things that nevertheless strike you as different as soon as you land.

The things that really strike you if you're coming from India are:

1. The cars greatly outnumber people and in any case, the population is quite sparse here compared to that in India.
2. The roads and streets are all well planned. Once you figure out how the streets are named, you face no difficulty at all in going anywhere.
3. The freeways (which are roads with a great number of lanes) make the ride very smooth with hardly any traffic jams, through which one can reach anywhere in the shortest time.
4. The train ride is very comfortable and the countryside (in my case, the seaside, as I traveled to San Diego) that one sees from the train is simply beautiful.
5. There are street performances on the busy and famous streets of the city, and this is the only place where one can see people walking about on the road.
6. If you have not googled your way to reach a place, you are doomed, as no one here knows anything apart from their own destinations and routes. So, you definitely cannot find your way here by asking around people. That I think is the biggest disadvantage and advantage. Everyone here is so well equipped with their devices that they don't really need anyone to show them anything. That maybe a good as well as a bad thing. 

I visited New York, Los Angeles, Ventura, Pasadena and San Diego. This was quite an experience as I traveled to places on my own and felt like a proper tourist, albeit with my very primitive phone camera and a piece of paper with directions and bus routes scribbled on it. I think traveling to new places alone too has a different kind of joy, such that you don't experience when you're in company when you are more distracted and you probably don't look at everything and everyone present! I had my set of fun...I noticed everything and everyone around me, the beautiful weather, the clean blue sea, the roads, the parks, the trees, the kids jumping around, the girls with their high-pitched giggles looking like they've come straight out of a fashion magazine, the couples getting all coochy-cooey in public (including gays!), the boys with their baseballs on the beach, the kids with the skateboards, the people on bikes (what we call cycles) who carried their bikes with them wherever they went- on buses, on trains, just about anywhere and everywhere they went, the many different kinds of dogs that people walked- the smallest to the largest, the homeless people sleeping in their sleeping bags on the pavement. I even witnessed a minor squabble between a black woman and a white woman in the bus. And, in the opposite scenario, I witnessed two men (a black and a white) spontaneously start to discuss the most recent match of American football, even though they were complete strangers before their encounter on the bus. I liked the way the New York subway was connected to every place in the city. New York's Manhattan area had people walking on the streets and that I guess is the most crowded you can get in the US. Ventura (the harbour city) on the other hand was the quietest, with no people in shops or even restaurants next to the harbour. The quiet blue sea of Ventura was the one I loved the most. It was the most serene experience of being with nature with just the sea and the sea gulls. Comparing this to the beach of San Diego, it had more people on the beach enjoying the sun and the warm weather. The beach in LA was probably the dirtiest of the lot, but still much much cleaner than any beach in India. It too had a lot of birds gliding across the waters. And, I noticed a poor little bird with a broken leg as well that made me quite sad. I think it was one hell of an experience, something I'll cherish for years.

On the science-y aspect, I visited two universities, UCLA and Caltech, apart from my participation in the conference. UCLA is a huge university with approximately 20,000 students. It is a very lively campus, unlike IISc. There were students at every corner of the campus, and it felt like the entire place was bubbling with enthusiasm. The physics and astronomy building's elevators were all marked with all the important equations of physics- from Schrodinger's to Navier Stokes to Maxwell's equation of electromagnetism. Somehow, entering such a place gives you a very profound feeling of being surrounded by ideas of important research questions. The effect it creates is something worth experiencing. The people of the campus were extremely friendly and some of them even walked me to the exact building I wanted to reach. I won't bore you about the mundane details of my talk. All I can say is that I left the place awed and enriched!

And, if UCLA had that kind of an effect on me, Caltech went several notches higher. Caltech is more like IISc. It has fewer students but nevertheless when you look around the campus, the scientific roots that it has leaves you overawed. It currently has three nobel laureates in the chemistry department. It has seen so many prominent scientists during its history that you can encounter the marks they have left all around the campus. It has housed numerous nobel laureates and other prominent scientists. The pH meter (used for quantitatively measuring the acidity of a fluid), the richter scale (used to quantify the energy released during the earthquake) were invented there. The campus itself has small structures that add to its beauty. There is one fountain in the shape of a DNA. There is a sundial through which you can accurately tell the time by looking at where the shadow falls during any time of the day. There is a structure of the ferritin (which is a protein that stores iron) next to the biology building. Visiting Caltech  for a science student is nothing less than being on a pilgrimage.

There were two other places I visited in Los Angeles: The Griffiths Observatory and The Natural History Museum. I visited the Griffiths Observatory at night and one could see almost the entire LA city lit up in the night sky. It was beautiful! The observatory itself had a tour of sorts into the world of astronomy, its history and its various phenomena related to the sun and stars explained. The Natural History Museum was on the other hand a tour in the history of evolution of species of the earth. The huge dinosaur fossils that they have gathered over several decades left you awed at just the size of each one of them. Had they walked, they would have looked like a building that is moving. Both the places had a lot of kids and it made me realize how lucky they were to get exposed to science in its most magnificent form at so tiny an age.

I think my US visit gave me new experiences every single day of my stay and I enjoyed it thoroughly!



  1. Excellent post however , I was wanting to know if you
    could write a litte more on this topic? I'd be very thankful if you could elaborate a little bit further. Cheers!

    my website Villas in Turkey
    Also see my web site: turkey villas


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advocating for science

A country's expenditure on research and the attitudes of its citizens towards science and technology are one of the leading parameters of development of a country. India spends about 0.65 % of its GDP (world bank data for 2015) on research and development, a number that has not changed much in two decades. The Indian educational system too on the other hand does not help in creating scientific temperament. The education is mostly a means to secure a job, any job, however far removed it might be from the field you've studied. 
These issues are even more apparent when you interact with people not related to the field. There is a lack of curiosity about science even among educated people. In fact, some are also of the view that it is a waste of the taxpayer's money. They go so far as to complain about the fact that their tax money is being used to fund PhD scholarships of students in Indian institutions. This, when the government's own defense and space research related …

Can you ever question your belief in God?

Your religion is decided for you based on the family you're born into almost immediately after your birth. This is further reinforced during your childhood with the various customs and rituals that you're part of, each one involving prayers to a higher being. Then, it is no surprise that you get brainwashed into believing in God. After all, it is the biggest fantasy or myth that your parents and your community have indulged in and have made you a part of, so much so, that it becomes part of your identity. Later when you experience more of the world, learn more science, see more sense in logic than unfounded beliefs, you start to question the existence of God. You notice how the fallacy of the religious belief begs the question that if God created man, who created God? You probably have already imbibed so much of the belief both consciously and sub-consciously that any loss in this faith comes across to you as a desertion of your own identity. How then can you ever break away …

Nature gives us no choice...

The breaking news story in the world of sports right now is the one about Serena Williams announcing her pregnancy. And while this is probably good news, it is not something her fans look forward to. I'm sure it must have been a huge decision for her and something that she must be coming to terms with even now as I write this. The pregnancy means that Serena Williams, the best women's tennis player ever in the open era, who is still at her prime and has just won the Australian Open 2017 will now miss the rest of the season this year. How unfair is that! Why does she have to choose between being a mother and playing tennis when her male counterparts just go through parenthood with a breeze. They never ever have to sit out, never have to make such life changing decisions, never have to contemplate and plan their return to tennis after the birth of their child. 
It is just frustrating that the likes of Djokovic and Federer have been at their prime winning titles with fatherhood …