Skip to main content

Rafa all the way


This has been a phenomenal year for Rafael Nadal. Winning 3 Grand  Slams in a year was known to be Roger Federer's forte. Well, that surely has changed and it seems as though the roles have been reversed. This year Roger was down to one Slam and Rafa won the other three. For a die hard Federer fan which I am, it's hard to digest the fact that his ranking has slipped to the 3rd, that he has won just the Australian Open this year, that his phenomenal streak of reaching 23 consecutive Slam semis was broken, that he was beaten by Novak Djokovic (whom he has beat all the previous years) in this year's US Open semis. All this and more has happened this year. This year, one particular player, not named Roger Federer has dominated all the slams and most of the tour. This saddens me. But then, one can't help but admire the humility that Rafa shows, no matter how much I want to hate him for having displaced Roger from the pedestal and making it his own. For all the comparisons people make between him and Roger, for all the comments made about Rafa being or on the path to being the greatest ever in the history of tennis, he himself has never once said that he is the best. He, in all humility accepts the compliments, but still considers Roger the best ever, and when he says so, you have to believe it, as he says it with complete honesty. So then, how can a Federer fan not feel happy about Rafa winning the US Open.

Both Roger and Rafa play at such a high level and with such contrasting styles, that when they meet on Tennis' grandest arenas-the four Slams-it becomes the ultimate match, the one that shows how an ideal match ought to be played. These matches are a celebration of Tennis in their own right. Rafa plays every single point as if his life hangs by it, and that, even when he has already broken his opponent's serve once. That grit, that fight for every point is simply amazing. He will run, and run like hell, even if everyone can see that there's absolutely no way for him to reach it. A wise person would probably conserve his energy for longer rallies, for winners. But, not Rafa. You might call him stupid for doing that. But, it is this inherent naivety that brings him trophies.

Roger on the other hand plays every point with such grace, that one can't help but admire the beauty of his shots. This US Open again saw him playing his famous signature shot of last year, "the tweener". It seems as though tennis journalists have to come up with new words every year just to name Federer's shots. And then, to describe their beauty, they have to come up with some more. When Federer plays tennis, it is a visual treat difficult to describe in words.

Somehow, this year, they didn't reach the finals of the same slams and we missed the treat. Hopefully, we will get to watch a few Roger-Rafa slam finals with Roger winning a few next year. But, until then, kudos to Rafa for achieving so much while still so young. 
Labels:

Comments

  1. Igor DarwinSeptember 21, 2010 at 3:51 AM

    Very well written! and a fitting picture to go with the article. How I wish more fans would see things in a right perspective.

    ReplyDelete
  2. RSSeptember 21, 2010 at 10:31 AM

    Thanks Igor. :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Devil's discipleDecember 22, 2010 at 12:01 AM

    I am a die hard Nadal fan. I hate Federer religiously, (though I admit if anything can match Federer in beauty, it can only be Zidane in football and Laxman in cricket) being a die hard Sampras fan.

    It is interesting to note how Federer had to accept Nadal as a genuine challenge to his dominance. It took him 2008 to admit that Nadal is a challenge. Before 2010 US open, he was claiming Nadal can be considered as an all time great potential only if he wins in Flushing Meadows.

    Hopefully 2011 will bring new twists and turns in the Fedex-Rafa rivalry

    ReplyDelete
  4. RSDecember 22, 2010 at 2:20 PM

    @ Devil's disciple: This year's World Tour Finals saw the finals played between Roger and Rafa. And, Roger posted a comprehensive victory against Rafa. Even though, it was not a Slam, it was a fitting reply to all the cynics out there who think Roger is done and can never compete at the highest level anymore. Can't wait for the Australian Open to begin. And yes, hopefully 2011 will bring new twists and turns in the Fedex-Rafa rivalry.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Devil's discipleDecember 22, 2010 at 4:10 PM

    True, Federer did not struggle for the win. But was not comprehensive either. Rafa did manage to win a set.

    Federer till recently did not have a coach. He was such a genius that he could rectify all the flaws in his game by himself. Let us see whether with a coach he makes a comeback in 2011.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Looking back on the last 5 years: Dedicated to my students

IISER Bhopal Campus I remember my first day at IISER Bhopal on 31st Jan. 2019. I had just arrived, all jet-lagged and groggy eyed. I filled up all the forms, met the HOD of my department and was taken to my new office. Thereafter, I was asked to go to the Chirayu Hospital for a medical check-up, was asked to fill up some more forms upon my return to campus and left to my own devices. However, I did not have a bank account, a phone number, a PAN card and most importantly, good internet (hah!). Procuring all these over the course of the next 10 days led to varying levels of frustration with the Indian system. It was a reverse cultural shock in some sense and made me question my decision of coming back to India. I think it is fair to say that my postdoctoral experience in the US had left me drained and this new life here was not helping in making me feel better. I was like a fish out of water, not able to find comfort anywhere. The next few months of my professional life were a struggle w...
11 comments
Read more

A letter to the "smart" students

To the students who think they're so smart that they can fool the instructor: Sorry to break this to you, but no, you're not fooling anybody! In fact, you are the fool if you think otherwise. So, let me tell you something that might shine a light on your otherwise dead brain. Learning is a two-way street. If you want to learn, I am willing to teach over and beyond what is expected of me. I will still teach even if you don't want to learn because that is my job. However, like they say, you can only bring the horse to the water, you cannot make it drink.  When you leave the class, I notice. When you talk, I notice. When you don't bring a notebook or a pen and pretend to be attentive, I notice. So, to reiterate, you're really not fooling anybody. I frankly don't care. I am happier teaching a small class of students who are sincere and want to learn. In fact, that's better for me. As then, we are in sync and I don't have to worry about the distractor...
8 comments
Read more

Phrases that must never be used when talking to your PhD Guide

There are some phrases that must never be uttered when talking to your PhD guide. 'Coz if you do, then you might have to endure a lecture from him/her that will leave you wondering what got into you, that you said that!! "You said so earlier..." : Never ever say this. If your Prof. asks you to remove something from your presentation that he himself had asked you to add, you're done for if you tell him, "But, you asked me to put this in earlier". The standard reply you may get will be something like this- "I may have said so many things." Or worse, you may get a scorn for a reply that will instantly shut you up. "I didn't get time to..." : You should definitely steer clear from saying anything of this sort. 'Coz if you do, then before you even finish your sentence, you're bound to get a look that says, "What? You didn't get time?!!." Then your Prof. will ask you, "So, what is it that you do that you don't...
11 comments
Read more